February Recap: The Market Navigates Economic and Policy Uncertainty in February

Monthly Market Summary

• The S&P 500 Index returned -1.3%, outperforming the Russell 2000 Index’s -5.2% return. Six of the eleven S&P 500 sectors traded higher, led by defensive sectors.
• Bonds traded higher, with the U.S. Bond Aggregate delivering a +2.2% total return. Corporate investment-grade bonds produced a +2.4% total return as Treasury yields declined, outperforming corporate high-yield’s +1.0% total return.
• International stocks traded higher and outperformed the S&P 500. Developed Markets gained +3.0%, led by Europe, while Emerging Markets returned +1.1%.

Stocks and Bonds Move in Opposite Directions Amid Market Rotation

Stocks traded lower in a late-month sell-off as sentiment weakened. The S&P 500’s decline erased most of its post-election gains, which had been driven by expectations for stronger growth and deregulation under the new administration. Smaller companies underperformed, with the Russell 2000 ending the month more than -10% below its late November peak. Beneath the surface, the January market rotation continued as last year’s outperformers lagged. The Magnificent 7, a group of mega-cap tech stocks that drove most of 2024’s gains, fell by -8% and dragged down the Nasdaq 100, the Large Cap Growth factor, and the S&P 500. In contrast, defensive sectors and international stocks traded higher, while gold set a new all-time high. In the bond market, Treasury yields declined, with the 10-year yield falling to its lowest level since early December. The decline in interest rates caused bonds to rise, partially offsetting the stock market sell-off.

Economic Growth Holds Steady, but Market Reacts to High Expectations

The sell-off wasn’t triggered by a single event or data point but by a combination of interconnected factors. Economic reports underperformed expectations and revealed a cooling U.S. economy, as the services sector contracted and consumer confidence deteriorated. The combination signaled slowing consumer demand, a key pillar of economic growth during recent years. In Washington, policy uncertainty remained high, with renewed tariff threats against key trading partners and DOGE spending cuts. The market’s primary concern: imposing tariffs and reducing government spending could slow economic growth. In the stock market, Nvidia’s highly anticipated earnings report failed to reignite enthusiasm for AI companies, leading to a broader sell-off in technology stocks.

Market Sentiment Shifts from Growth to Caution in February

Following the election, the market initially focused on the incoming administration’s pro-growth policies. Expectations for tax cuts, deregulation, and increased energy production fueled hopes for stronger U.S. economic growth. At the start of the year, investors were optimistic about a “Goldilocks” scenario—moderate growth, cooling inflation, and lower interest rates. The optimism propelled stocks to new record highs this year, but with economic and policy uncertainty building, investor sentiment has become more cautious. The focus has now shifted from solid earnings growth and a robust labor market to concerns about slowing economic growth and uncertain government policy.

Source: Morningstar.

Disclosures

Investment advisory services offered through Robertson Stephens (“Robertson Stephens”), an SEC-registered investment advisor. Registration does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. This material is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment, tax or legal advice. It does not constitute a recommendation or offer to buy or sell any security, has not been tailored to the needs of any specific investor, and should not provide the basis for any investment decision. Please consult with your Advisor prior to making any investment decisions. The information contained herein was compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but Robertson Stephens does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Information, views and opinions are current as of the date of this presentation, are based on the information available at the time, and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. Robertson Stephens assumes no duty to update this information. Unless otherwise noted, any individual opinions presented are those of the author and not necessarily those of Robertson Stephens. Performance may be compared to several indices. Indices are unmanaged and reflect the reinvestment of all income or dividends but do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses which would reduce returns. A complete list of Robertson Stephens Investment Office recommendations over the previous 12 months is available upon request. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Forward-looking performance objectives, targets or estimates are not guaranteed and may not be achieved. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Alternative investments are speculative and involve substantial risks including significant loss of principal, high illiquidity, long time horizons, uneven growth rates, high fees, onerous tax consequences, limited transparency and limited regulation. Alternative investments are not suitable for all investors and are only available to qualified investors. Please refer to the private placement memorandum for a complete listing and description of terms and risks. This material is an investment advisory publication intended for investment advisory clients and prospective clients only. Robertson Stephens only transacts business in states in which it is properly registered or is excluded or exempted from registration. A copy of Robertson Stephens’ current written disclosure brochure filed with the SEC which discusses, among other things, Robertson Stephens’ business practices, services and fees, is available through the SEC’s website at: www.adviserinfo.sec.gov. © 2025 Robertson Stephens. All rights reserved. Robertson Stephens is a registered trademark of Robertson Stephens in the United States and elsewhere

Robertson Stephens paid no fee to obtain recognition but has paid licensing fees to reference its appearances on the Newsweek, USA Today, and FA Magazine rankings lists. See Awards Disclosures