In light of the new tariffs imposed by President Trump and the sharp increase in the price of oil (Brent was above $100 this weekend but has fallen equally sharply to start the week), questions about Federal Reserve policy have flared again. Nothing has changed in the original calculus that has encouraged the Federal Reserve to eschew raising interest rates to restrain inflation; the inflationary pressures are caused by supply-side factors that should be temporary (“transitory”), with tariffs having a one-time effect on the rate of inflation and oil prices expected to fall when the conflict in the Persian Gulf ends. And yet . . . The new tariffs come on top of price hikes associated with previous tariffs that are commonly thought still to be fully witnessed. The conflict in the Persian Gulf seems never-ending, may yet to turn into a permanent tax on oil, via transit tolls, and has expanded to the Red Sea chokepoint controlled by the Houthis. At a certain point, monetary authorities begin to question whether an inflation problem originating in a supply shock over which they have little control becomes a demand-side problem that they can, and must, address. In this logic, strong consumer demand makes it possible for businesses to pass along price increases that would otherwise need to be absorbed in profit margins. In the last two months, interest rates have been raised by the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of Korea, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand and the Bank of Israel. Over the weekend, Singapore monetary authorities, who control monetary policy via managing the US dollar exchange rate, tightened monetary policy as well, citing the anticipated inflation from newly high oil prices. Central bankers talk to each other, frequently, and often coordinate their actions. Those central banks that have held rates steady as their peers have acted may increasingly find this to be an environment demanding action.
Data to Watch
Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) Interest Rate Decision and Press Conference, Wednesday, July 29
US GDP growth rate, Second Quarter (first estimate), released Thursday, July 30
US Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) Price Index for June, released Thursday, July 30
Suggested Reading
A Global Economy Jolted by an Oil Shock Now Gets a Tariff Reminder
Mortgage Rates Hit Highest Levels in Nearly a Year
America’s Enterprising Spirit Is Booming After Decades-Long Slump
Weekly Commentary
Week of July 27, 2026 – Weekly Economic Commentary
Jeanette Garretty
In light of the new tariffs imposed by President Trump and the sharp increase in the price of oil (Brent was above $100 this weekend but has fallen equally sharply to start the week), questions about Federal Reserve policy have flared again. Nothing has changed in the original calculus that has encouraged the Federal Reserve to eschew raising interest rates to restrain inflation; the inflationary pressures are caused by supply-side factors that should be temporary (“transitory”), with tariffs having a one-time effect on the rate of inflation and oil prices expected to fall when the conflict in the Persian Gulf ends. And yet . . . The new tariffs come on top of price hikes associated with previous tariffs that are commonly thought still to be fully witnessed. The conflict in the Persian Gulf seems never-ending, may yet to turn into a permanent tax on oil, via transit tolls, and has expanded to the Red Sea chokepoint controlled by the Houthis. At a certain point, monetary authorities begin to question whether an inflation problem originating in a supply shock over which they have little control becomes a demand-side problem that they can, and must, address. In this logic, strong consumer demand makes it possible for businesses to pass along price increases that would otherwise need to be absorbed in profit margins. In the last two months, interest rates have been raised by the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of Korea, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand and the Bank of Israel. Over the weekend, Singapore monetary authorities, who control monetary policy via managing the US dollar exchange rate, tightened monetary policy as well, citing the anticipated inflation from newly high oil prices. Central bankers talk to each other, frequently, and often coordinate their actions. Those central banks that have held rates steady as their peers have acted may increasingly find this to be an environment demanding action.
Data to Watch
Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) Interest Rate Decision and Press Conference, Wednesday, July 29
US GDP growth rate, Second Quarter (first estimate), released Thursday, July 30
US Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) Price Index for June, released Thursday, July 30
Suggested Reading
A Global Economy Jolted by an Oil Shock Now Gets a Tariff Reminder
Mortgage Rates Hit Highest Levels in Nearly a Year
America’s Enterprising Spirit Is Booming After Decades-Long Slump
Disclosure and Source
Investment advisory services offered through Robertson Stephens Wealth Management, LLC (“Robertson Stephens”), an SEC-registered investment advisor. Registration does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. This material is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment, tax or legal advice. It does not constitute a recommendation or offer to buy or sell any security, has not been tailored to the needs of any specific investor, and should not provide the basis for any investment decision. Please consult with your Advisor prior to making any Investment decisions. The information contained herein was carefully compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but Robertson Stephens cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Information, views and opinions are current as of the date of this presentation, are based on the information available at the time, and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. Robertson Stephens assumes no duty to update this information. Unless otherwise noted, any individual opinions presented are those of the author and not necessarily those of Robertson Stephens. Indices are unmanaged and reflect the reinvestment of all income or dividends but do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses which would reduce returns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Forward-looking performance targets or estimates are not guaranteed and may not be achieved. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Alternative investments are only available to qualified investors and are not suitable for all investors. Alternative investments include risks such as illiquidity, long time horizons, reduced transparency, and significant loss of principal. This material is an investment advisory publication intended for investment advisory clients and prospective clients only. Robertson Stephens only transacts business in states in which it is properly registered or is excluded or exempted from registration. A copy of Robertson Stephens’ current written disclosure brochure filed with the SEC which discusses, among other things, Robertson Stephens’ business practices, services and fees, is available through the SEC’s website at: www.adviserinfo.sec.gov. © 2026 Robertson Stephens Wealth Management, LLC. All rights reserved. Robertson Stephens is a registered trademark of Robertson Stephens Wealth Management, LLC in the United States and elsewhere. A3623
Talk To Us